Order vs. Chaos

BookofUnspin

Saturday, June  21, 2014

Order vs Chaos

Most people understand that “freedom” without limits or restraints quickly becomes chaos. Real freedom only exists within rigid boundaries, and we call this state of balance “order”. Even nature is governed by severe and unchanging laws that provide a backdrop for the unfolding drama of living creatures in a magical world teeming with diversity.

In the same way, the Golden Rule gives society a backbone of behavioral limits to encourage individual and collective enterprise, and promotes free expression and free association within a framework of purpose and reason. However, if that rigid skeleton is decayed through the corruption of the very individuals and institutions that have been given a mandate to uphold things like honesty, fairness and peaceful relations, their hypocrisy fosters anarchy and chaos around the globe. If the world ever needed a “Day of Judgment”, it is now.

The“bastions” of finance have turned out to be bloodsucking parasites without conscience, and the elected “leadership” is either unwilling or unable to curtail their greed. In fact, governments have rewarded a frenzy of Ponzi schemes, fraudulent investment firms, and bankrupt banks with an open door to the public purse.

National rulers around the world have begun to follow the example of U.S. Presidents by using military force to wage war on “foreign terrorists” within their own population and in neighboring countries. Heavily armed troops are blindly attacking peaceful protestors without mercy - simply following the orders of their chain of command without question.

Man-made environmental disasters are increasing in size and regularity, and the governing agencies are merely dancing puppets for giant industries, selling the promise of jobs and wealth as a justification for mutilating the planet to benefit a very few. As yet, nuclear regulators (I.A.E.A.) have no authority to prevent reactors being built on fault lines, and they still have no idea what to do with the spent fuel rods. Massive oil spills have become the price of “progress”, and global warming is still a debate.

If we allow ourselves to be ruled by professional manipulators, who use half-truths, innuendo and bald faced lies to get themselves elected or to remain in power, then we probably deserve whatever horrors the future might hold. Reverence for truth, and respect for one another, used to be the fire for religious revival and social change, but all the major religions have chosen to portray Divinity in the image of a frightened Ostrich, blissfully unaware of reality, having placed his/her bet on the outcome long ago.

Global Terror

The conflict of "news reports" out of Ukraine is enough to drive anyone crazy.  One story relates the rejection of an artificial military junta (directed by no less than the head of the CIA) by a courageous, local, democratic protest of a huge majority of Russian speaking citizens in the East.  In this version, the Russian president is a kindly father-figure who is prepared to acknowledge his long lost children and defend them against the western hordes.

Western media is united in refusing to broadcast this story, however, and the reports that are printed and aired tell of a brutal assault by Russian special forces to divide a peaceful Ukraine in preparation for military occupation.  The same news networks are reporting that the elected government of Syria is dropping saran gas bombs on civilians and burning their corpses in a prison crematorium to destroy evidence.  They quote the "Syrian Observatory for Human Rights" as their source (one man in a London apartment who hasn't been to Syria in 15 years), and play "documentaries" provided by rebel armies as "proof".

Closer to home, the leaking of Democrat emails by an angry whistle blower who hated to see Bernie Sanders railroaded out of contention for presidential candidacy has been spun into another McCarthy inquisition pretending to find "the Russians" are responsible for any and all corruption in the world.
Who are we supposed to believe? Not the western version, that's for sure.

Ever since the story of premature babies being ripped out of their incubators in Kuwait, I realize that the propaganda machine of the United States has no conscience.  The artificial "War on Terror" ha;s been deeply ingrained in the American psyche - ever since their army had to massacre the native "savages" to make the country "safe".  In recent history this "war on terror" has included the use of illegal imprisonment, water boarding, surgical drone strikes and threats of nuclear attack.  Providing false documents and spreading disinformation has become an uncontested weapon of the American military, the largest military in history, and I, for one, am sick and tired of listening to the lies.  If anyone wants to negotiate a peaceful solution to any of today's conflicts, they have to start by holding the real terrorists accountable.  The United Nations should only be directed by countries who have proved their ability and commitment to peace... like Iceland, or Sweden, or ... ???

Irrational beliefs

YOU CAN'T PROVE A NEGATIVE

Scientists have long been frustrated with religious beliefs because the very concept of “faith” requires believing something regardless of “evidence”. No matter how much evidence is presented regarding the gradual evolution of species from common ancestry, science cannot prove to bible believers that there is no God. It's a little like the problems with proving that there is no life on Mars to scientists … even landing a robot to send back live pictures will not satisfy those who truly “believe.” If they have found no evidence, it must be because the robot is not sensitive enough so another robot will have to be designed. Or perhaps the whole concept of life-form will have to be redefined! The truth is that a negative statement cannot be proved – only doubted or believed. This is the reason that humans can be deceived over and over and over again. Anyone can claim the existence of the most bizarre imagination and no one can prove them wrong.

Reality, on the other hand, exists regardless of belief or doubt. Science itself is a constant investigation of physical reality, using impartial evidence and rigorous testing of any theory before it is commonly accepted, much like what is supposed to happen in a courtroom trial. What truly exists, what truly happens, and what truly causes the myriad interactions in the universe adds up to Reality, and there can be seven billion different opinions about what is true, but the truth doesn't change. In my opinion, false and misleading statements are the root of all human confusion, and people who rewrite history, lie under oath, teach absurdity to innocent minds or use others as scapegoats to hide their own avarice and greed should be convicted and silenced. The whole concept of free speech is to allow everyone access to information and understanding, and people who have quiet wisdom to share are being drowned out by the noise of gibberish and hate.

The world today is being threatened by a financial system that is trying to borrow its way out of debt, governments that insist on peace by military conquest, nuclear power regulators that claim that Fukushima is under control (no harm done), and a host of religious peacocks strutting the stage and anticipating a triumphant appearance of a savior. I think that they are all wrong, but there is no way to prove a negative.

Quebec takes on Religious Hypocrisy

QUEBEC TAKES ON RELIGIOUS HYPOCRISY

The purpose of the new legislation that prohibits Quebec government employees from wearing obvious forms of religious paraphernalia is to guarantee a safe and rational base for society, free from artificial social barriers and the radicalized foment of religious sects. The founders of the religions themselves would probably support the new law enthusiastically, and remind their followers that devotion can't be demonstrated by wearing any kind of uniform or symbol, but by an inner purity and character that cannot be seen on the outside like an identity tattoo. If religious teachers had any reverence for the likes of Moses, Jesus, the prophet Mohammed, or even the Buddha, they would be teaching their followers the difference between real and pretend faith. Otherwise, we might end up with violent conflicts between Protestant and Catholic “christians”, Zionist and Orthodox “jews”, Shia and Sunni “muslims” etc., and thinking people would probably turn to Atheism or Hedonism in revolt.

What seems dubious to me is the posturing of the Parti Quebecois as an authority on bringing people together in peace, and protecting the gullible from separatist religious organizations that seek to sew division in a secular world. The strength of democratic government is an educated and sensible voting public, but all of the existing “parties” are guilty of repetitive fear mongering and emotional rabble rousing, and while the media focuses attention on silly headlines, the entire globe is being threatened by a collapse of the financial system, the explosion of nuclear fuel rods, the effects of fossil fuel pollution, and the constant threat of atomic, biological and conventional warfare at the whim of unstable human beings. These problems should be bringing the world together to find a solution, but our attention is riveted on the staged antics of both elected officials and religious leaders while the real issues are ignored. Hopefully, their time is running out.

Separation of Church and State

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

In a perfect world, the mandate for government and the mandate for spiritual guidance would be identical – a quest for the “common good”. The state and the church would be two arms of authority gathering people together in a synchronized effort to end the constant bitterness and violence of human society, and create a sustainable, reasonable peace where every person could participate and flourish. The only difference between these institutions would be the method used to accomplish this goal – the state using decrees and enforcement while the church set an example and taught others to follow. In the real world, however, it is essential to keep the division between them absolute, and guard against any kind of overlap.

Imagine what would happen if a political party or military council was able to convince the population that they operated with divine inspiration behind every decision, behind every demand, and that their motive was a constant, selfless caring for their fellow man. They could spend the taxes they collected on projects that would perpetuate this appearance, hire writers and advertising firms to bolster their public image of altruistic effort, and publicly discredit anyone who refused to believe the deception. Government would become the holy sanctuary of forgiveness and mercy (for anyone who pledged support for the campaign). “Salvation” (approval) would come down to voting for the acceptable candidate, or volunteering for the army.

On the other hand, try to imagine the church as a cold, indifferent agency that administered a strict set of rules that must be obeyed to avoid punishment. Officers would be selected by their zeal to enforce the doctrine, and administer the approved “discipline”. The congregation of this church would become very orderly, as anyone that challenged the “discipline” would automatically be regarded as an “enemy” of the faith.

Obviously, in our present world, the lines between the state and the church have become blurred, and the result is confusion and hysteria. The goal of improving human relationships has been replaced by the struggle for position and power, and society is the loser. I believe that it is time to untangle this confusion by demanding that the government stick to telling us what we can do (rights and freedoms), cannot do (criminal law), and must do (taxes, licenses and inspections), and that the church return to the task of representing God in truth and spirit.

Stock Market Correction

STOCK MARKET CORRECTION

Now that the markets are stabilizing somewhat, we can all breathe a sigh of relief. That was scary – watching the prices plummet all at once around the entire world. There really wasn’t any need to worry, as the system has worked well for hundreds of years, but it does make me pause to wonder “what if?”


What if all of the major institutions are connected - interdependent so to speak? When the banks fail, (like the Savings and Loan debacle a few years back), the government steps in to restore confidence by bailing them out with tax dollars. When the stock market becomes unstable, the banks invest heavily with depositor’s cash to stabilize the situation and restore confidence. Governments take all the credit for a “booming economy” and a “robust market” to win elections and coast to victory on the restored confidence. What if all these institutions were built on foundations of greed, deception and arrogance and we all just stopped placing our confidence in them?

The result would probably be chaos! Wars would have no justification. Insurance companies would be forced to redefine an “Act of God”. Strikes and lockouts would make no sense. Farmers and tradesmen would be at the top of the “food chain”. Social assistance would have to be personal and close to home. In fact, if we all stopped relying on big government, bank credit and market “analysts” we would have to rely on each other as if we lived in a real community! The only things with any value to society would be integrity, friendship, cooperation and mutual respect.

Culture would eventually stop being something you purchase at a video store or on a CD. People would have to build honorable reputations like they used to. News would have to be reported, not created. Parents would have to tend to their children's education instead of arming them with Nike running shoes and sending them forth. It would be a nightmare. Utter chaos!

Bride of Frankenstein

THE BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN

Many pundits see the first trans-gender contestant in Donald Trump's “Miss Universe Contest” as a breakthrough from the historical simplicity of gender, claiming that the amazing beauty on stage was living proof that sex is more complicated than male and female, and that introducing personal feelings and choice to an otherwise cold and indifferent fact is simply the result of human compassion and ingenuity. I see this as the latest assault on reason and common sense by the harbingers of deception and confusion. Why do some people insist that truth cannot be simple and easily understood?

The refusal to acknowledge that gender is either male or female demonstrates the same stubborn stupidity as slogans like “Guns don't kill people, people kill people”, or “It's the economy, stupid!” The truth is simple – guns are designed and promoted to be used as weapons to maim and kill other people. And in a society where the wasted meals from restaurants could feed the entire homeless population of every city, and where giant, heated office towers stand empty every night while people cower in cardboard boxes in the street, there is no thought for economy in our present system.

Perhaps the tenacity of this ignorance is rooted in the desperation to be in charge of our own destiny, but attempting to reorder the universe to fit personalized specifications can become extremely complicated (and enormously expensive), so we usually settle for changing “reality” to suit our aspirations instead. We can all pretend that the Fukushima disaster is safely behind us, that the financial experts will solve the debt crisis, and that a war with Iran, or Russia, or China, ..., is necessary to guarantee lasting peace in the region and around the world. And while we're at it, we can just ignore the fact that the Miss Universe crown might go to a modern upgrade of the Bride of Frankenstein.

It seems to me that the simple answer is to find the serenity to accept those things we cannot change, courage to change the things we can, and wisdom to know the difference.